Saturday, July 4, 2009

New Fiction Special

Don't expect much from here for a while. If something comes up, I'll let you know. My parents will visit later this month. I might spend part of August in Paris. Here are pictures of Jorge Luis Borges, Arthur Rimbaud, Yoona, Kanye West, Mark Zuckerberg, Phoenix, some students at my school in front of a bulletin board (from the school's web site), a mess of sea turtles, a picture that ran in a recent NYTimes article about North Korea, another one, and R2D2.

Happy Fourth!


READ FULL POST . . .




Saturday, June 13, 2009

Over the Rainbow

In Thursday night's dream, I surfed the internet. The room my dream counterpart was in was the same room my sleeping self was in. The desk was the same desk; the computer, the same computer. As far as I could tell, the internet cruised along at the pace I'm used to. I was happily browsing familiar Web sites, checking in at Facebook and Twitter, finishing up reading an article and skipping over to Wikipedia to prime myself on some information, or streaming video of related content from Le Monde or Le Nouvel Observateur.

At first sight, this may not make for compelling dream narrative, but there was something distinctly ethereal about it. I felt altogether liberated, unencumbered by the minute, half-conscious decisions and vacillations that detail our every search, each page we visit and each link we do or do not click. I never felt the subtle panic that accompanies my stops at busy news sites, where I'm constantly deciding which 2 or 3 stories should receive my attention. And for that matter, I didn't worry that the story at the New York Times wasn't the definitive account, and that I might be better served at the Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal, or the Associated Press. Nor did I feel guilty about interrupting that article to summon a new tab for Twitter, or to check my email for no other reason than that the impulse to do so suddenly struck me. I was never frustrated by an imprecise Google search that sent me back to square one, not crushed but feeling a little defeated, now forced to reevaluate my criteria and the very nature of the thing I'm after. Wikipedia never politely asked whether I didn't intend so-and-so when I typed such-and-such. Every page I set out for actually existed. There were no dead ends or wrong directions. I never had to scroll to the bottom of igoogle.co.kr/lg, to click "iGoogle in English" (a process that has become an irritating 5 seconds, repeated several times a day). Not only pop-ups, but all advertisements were absent. It was miraculous. What happened in that dream has only ever happened in commercials voiced-over by young working men-and-women with encouraging voices. Stay connected to the people who matter, now, faster than ever. Welcome to the internet of your dreams. Bringing your world to you.

The most notable among the absentees were the people. Not once did I silently scoff at a disagreeable comment, or emend in my head a grammatical error or typo, either someone else's or, fearing someone would call me out, one of my own. This could also explain the ad-free environment. No one out to sell anything; no one but me to sell to. The content was as if culled from an exhaustive survey titled, "Things Michael Garberich would like to see on the internet." 

This was a Last Man scenario, like in the episode of the Twilight Zone where the only things to survive an apocalyptic nuclear blast were a bookworm and his glasses, and the world's library.  

There was no end to my satisfaction, not even the slightest impediment.

When I awoke I signed in to Twitter and wrote: "last night i dreamt i was surfing the internet. and was extraordinarily successful at it."

Two days later, I'm writing about it at length. Can't get it out of my mind. I guess you could say I'm dreamer. That's me. Wide awake, chasing dreams. Relieved that I am not actually the only person on the internet. That's one internet I have no interest in visiting.

AND NOW A SHORT LIST OF THINGS THAT HAPPENED

-Tuesday: Visited a PC Bang late at night to make last minute adjustments for ...

-Wednesday: Held a class for purposes of evaluation by my government employers. The next day, my coworker would tell me that when our head English teacher stopped her in the hall after the class to ask how I did, she replied, "Michael is a stage man," which I take to be both a compliment and an implicit complaint. And entirely accurate, in any case.

-Thursday: After work, I was treated to beer and sausage at a nearby restaurant. My coworker had had a bad day. In between bouts of sighing, she asked me to accompany her for a beer. She was hand dripping a cup of coffee for herself. When she finished, she sighed. She invited me out. I said 'yes' and made fun of her. She sighed again. At the restaurant we split a pitcher. Then I went to Korean class, where I thought of nothing but sleep and whether or not I smelled like Cass. During the first break the teacher asked why I was so tired. "After work, with a coworker," I started in English and finished in Korean, "I drank a lot of beer."

-Friday: Bought a basketball. Had dinner and drinks with a small group of friends. Played basketball, in the dark, with an even smaller group. 

-Saturday: Made significant steps toward a trip to Paris, to be taken in August.

-Sunday: Read from Orhan Pamuk's Istanbul and the New Yorker's annual Summer Fiction Issue. Picked up a week-old issue of TIME Magazine (the one with twitter on the cover), which doesn't age well.

READ FULL POST . . .




Saturday, June 6, 2009

Hey mom, it's a little tense, but really, we're OK

Dear Mom,

It's common for people to take my name and spin it into that of former, former Soviet Union leader, Mikhail Gorbachev. Easy to see why, though, don't you think? The 2 names are more or less consonant with one another, and I am regarded by many as a powerful and influential leader. Another touchstone is Marian Gaborik, who punches in 82 nights a year at right wing for the Minnesota Wild. Again, the names, the last name in particular, are so close as to tease the tongue. And again, Mr. Gaborik is a perennial star for his squad, a natural leader. The three of us, we go hand-in-hand-in-hand. Through wherever we pass the people say, "There go that estimable trio -- Mikhail Gorbachev, Marian Gaborik, and Michael Garberich -- how fortunate have our generations been to have beheld them each in their turn and, now, can you believe it, all at once!" Sunsets whoop and wail for the honor of silhouetting our ensemble. Coatracks cross themselves and bow to receive our jackets, coats, and blazers. I'm wondering: Do you and dad get the same treatment?

Anyway.

You were wondering some time ago about the political temperature in South Korea, whether it, and I, felt any of the heat drafting in from the North. I didn't know. Wasn't paying close enough attention, or asking the right questions. In truth, I wasn't asking any questions. Well, that's not entirely true. I asked one question, to my coworker, and it was more of a statement, really. It was: "More trouble in the North." My remark was a little snide, and the response met it in kind: "Yes, you will be dead soon." Who better than a cynical mother of 2 and lifelong educator to deflect smarting blows shot out by un- and underinformed youngsters?

No matter that I'm not the most dependable barometer for gauging this country's attitude toward its kinfolk up above. Because it seems my buddy and partial namesake, Mikhail Gorbachev, is. He sent me this letter a few days ago, dated, as you can see, on your birthday. I don't know why he had to go through so officious an intermediary as the New York Times, just to send me a message. But that's his prerogative, isn't it? Ole Gorby's been inclined to pomp and circumstance ever since his time with Reagan. Given all that we share, I guess I can accept his thinking, whatever it may be.

By the way, got your reservations for the hotel. Everything looks good.

Have a nice week, and happy birthday again,

The good son

READ FULL POST . . .




Thursday, May 21, 2009

Hansel and Gretel

For a short time in college it was my privilege to be staffed on a student publication. The few light duties that went with the work were such that I was convinced I held a special license permitting me to share my opinion about various trifles. Chief among these trifles were movies, but so too would I stretch out my thin voice to accommodate any number of the day's fashions -- art, literature, theater, popular music, food, television, and the internet. It's possible there were others that I now forget, but by and large these were it, these phenomena we lump into the progressively less competing categories of art and entertainment.

The typical approach focused on the people who set them in motion, or so was my hope. Which is not to say that I didn't sometimes forget this simple aim, and instead pursued the point as if it were a fixed mathematics rather than a significant means of communication observed in one state of an ongoing evolution. Because I surely did. It's easy to reduce a complex production to a thing we can more comfortably manage, and to look at that thing as if it had alien origins. But let's not distract ourselves with disingenuous apologies. I only wish to say I tried to keep my observations legitimate by keeping them close by our dail
y sides, roped in from over the moon and brought back down to Earth. It's to say that I have tried before, and that I hope to have retained at least the minimum energy the effort to try again will require. 

My guess is you already know this about me. And you may be wondering why I'd go out of the way to mention it here and now.

Well, it's because I intend to do it again, here and now, and ask that you allow me the indulgence.

Thing is, some weeks are scored such that their every moment ought to be given their fair and thorough recap. Others are so featureless that we do best when we compliment them with the greater efforts of other people. So we watch movies and television programs, pick up books and magazines, assume a posture and ponder a work of art, all of which originated elsewhere, beyond our control and very likely beyond our capability. Sometimes we do nothing more than get dressed and that's enough. It's enough that the fashions we've assumed as our own were conceived in minds inaccessible to us, and sewn by hands we have no chance of shaking, holding, touching or even seeing. Needless to say, this last week has been a welcomed example of the latter routine.

What is to come is a review of a Korean movie brought to me by chance. The title is Hansel and Gretel, both in Korean and in English. The ultimate verdict is it's good, not great. A psychological thriller that strikes a chord in the key of horror, of interest to most people w
ho can tolerate subtitles.

Why a review and why this movie? Partly for something to write about. We all have our cherished habits and fears for which we put up defenses. I once worked with a woman who ran 6 miles every day, either before or after work, and occasionally both. She had a family and a full time job. But any week that fell short of her stated quota of miles irritated her like a glass sliver. Those weeks that she found her responsibilities were cutting into her running were a great source of regret and guilt. I can relate. I'm no chronic blogger, a status you've no doubt noticed. But as the Turkish novelist Orhan Pamuk wrote, "In order to be happy I must have my daily dose of literature." He said that of both reading it and writing it. I haven't neglected the reading in five years. And even though I'm part of no school, movement, or masthead, if I did not write even this light fodder I'd no doubt despair at any of the innumerable incontrovertible features of my present course; I'd slink off into an alley and head for the first adequately miserable dumpster. What features exactly? For example, I might wring my hands over the fact that I still cannot understand when the convenient store clerk asks if I'd like my hamburger microwaved on the spot, or if I'm going to take it home. I always need the gesture. With the wrapped burger in hand, their eyes fixing a wary stare on me, they point at the microwave behind them and repeat the question. I've never said 'yes.' Of course this is to say nothing of my enthusiasm for these microwavable hamburgers and the absence of a certain skill set that would otherwise prevent me from cultivating this enthusiasm. (They're not delicious; but they are!) That would be a second feature. But no. Writing reduces the magnitude of these features. No matter how much they insist on clinging to my back, writing's a massive brush I can use to sweep them clean off. Pretty cool.

The other reason for my indulgence, put modestly, is a social contribution. I searched for information in English about this movie, but information in English is sliced very thin and lacks any distinguishing flavor. I have no doubt that whatever I come up with will improve immensely the quality of the content readily searchable on Hansel and Gretel. Unfortunately, I have no idea as to when this post will itself be readily searchable. If I have somehow succeeded and you have arrived here searching solely for information about Hansel and Gretel, it is my sincere wish that you see the following apology: sorry for crowding your objective with all this frivolity. Let's shove on, shall we?

The review follows the clip. The clip is the first 14 minutes of the movie, linked from but not hosted by mysoju.com. There you can find the movie in its entirety, albeit of compromised quality. Ladies and gentlemen ...

---------------------------------------------
TITLE: Hansel and Gretel (헨젤과 그레텔)
DIRECTED BY: Yim Pil-sung
STARRING: Cheon Jeon-yeong, Eun Won-jae
Shim Eun-kyeong, Jin Ji-hye
RELEASED: December 27, 2007
GENRE: Horror, Thriller
---------------------------------------------


Yim Pil-sung's Hansel and Gretel plumbs a shallow if persistent sub-genre of horror in which the promises of childhood fantasies are laid upon the chaise longue and reexamined for any cynicism that can be culled out from our complex psyche and given its proper label, "adult." Never mind that the horror genre itself, at least in movies, seems to be the candidate determined to entertain the adolescent mindset (knowing, for example, that what kids did last summer was sit through yet another installment of one or another horror series). If there is a folklore consistent throughout generations it is the irrepressible confidence that we see with ever sharper definition, and reach ever greater depths, into the stories that preceded us. Occasionally we might need a Susan Boyle to remind us of earlier lessons, but we're quick learners. We're grown-ups. We know the intrigue of a child's spirited world is a distortion of matured traumas. That the plump cupcake's generous credit must be paid for with steep interest, and that while one nasty stepmother might fit neatly into the wood stove, all our domestic issues aren't so easily remedied.

In the case of our leading man, Eun-su, a baby-faced member of Korea's prematurely plateaued professionals, the unannounced responsibilities of family life pursue him with cloak and scythe on a winding road under assault by heavy rain. He's en route to visit his mother in the hospital, and poorly managing a phone call with the mother of his child to be. Turns out he should have used a condom, or at least waited out the storm. And ought we to tell him a cell phone is no way to negotiate an unplanned pregnancy with your girlfriend? "I'm not an irresponsible person," you say? Are you really so surprised that she hangs up on you? The car littered with fast food wrappers and personal effects (a toy frog, some mens magazines) makes it clear enough that we're not riding shotgun with our childhood Prince Charming, and a snippet of conversation about his job doesn't betray our expectations. Whatever "unique products" his company is responsible for, he's just another salesman who long ago sold himself for some errant dream and now has nothing of himself left to advertise. Hold onto those fresh-faced good looks. Something tells us that if you've got a chance, they're going to be your saving grace.

Moments after his girlfriend hangs up on him, our man swerves to avoid a carcass, sending his outmoded sedan hydroplaning off the road and into a wood so thick with fog no sinister magic could resist setting up house. Cut to black. Fade to woods. And with that our tale of murder and intrigue, sugary confections and nurseries, swiftly gets under way.

That magical house is The House of Happy children, announced as such by the hanging sign stuck at the end of its cobbled walkway, behind which our adorable, if far off, guide, Young-hee, stops to pick a few ripe berries. The happy children in question are: Young-hee, the middle child, who appears to spend more time wandering idly in the forest than studying her multiplication tables; in the barrettes and white collared dress is the youngest, Jeong-sun, whose cuteness is as undeniable as her patience is short. When her way's not had, she tenses up and lets out a shrill alarm for her eldest sibling, Man-bok, who resists flashing his telekinetic powers as long as possible, which must explain why he's so short and inelegant with his words -- "Having a mother is nice," he says when Eun-su tries to look at the idea of Mothers rationally. Who needs language when you have such a stone-cold stare and can manipulate Ben Kenobi's force to make your enemies (mean adults!) submerge their hand in the pot of boiling water set atop the stove for dinner?

The parents, insofar as they're present at all, are twitchy figures who look great in their bright colored sweaters and smiles, and their shiny, styled hair. They might not have an appetite for the stacks of cookies and assorted sweets that dress the table. But that just means more for the children! In these woods, they're really just thinking of the children. Here, parents are replaceable, children are eternal. Turns out the children in this house are happy because no one's around to tell them what to do. And if they try all Man-bok has to do is close his eyes and think unhappy thoughts.

Like everything in the House of Happy Children and its shrouded, inescapable environs, the parents are a part of the fanciful design. And set design is Hansel and Gretel's greatest strength. The colors look scrubbed down with age and wear and neglect. The palette is formed around evocative greens and reds, which keeps you waiting on the Christmas theme (the movie was released in December of 2007) until the very end. The tipped-over toys covering every square inch of this enviable home are the only thing messier than Eun-su's car. Piles of dusty dolls and perverse animal masks and figurines are a quaint touch. Nothing screams horror like ugly dolls and perverse animals. Of course, what child's living room would be complete without a television? The House of Happy Children comes equipped. But the only available programming are old syndicates from the 70s and, get this, the T.V. isn't even plugged in!

As impressive as the layout is, it's the less accessible parts of the house wherein the story lies. Like any respectable psyche, the attic and hallways of the House of Happy Children are shadowy corridors of obscure references to an even shadowier past. When Eun-su starts following his curious instincts, Man-bok's cryptic warnings intensify, and the foundation of the House of Happy Children cracks and wavers. Despite his insistence that he needs to leave the woods to visit his ailing mother in the hospital, the House of Happy Children won't let him. It's a long and winding road, at turns scenic and mundane.

There's neither as much horror nor as much magic as Guillermo del Toro's Pan's Labyrinth of the year before. And the source of the children's flight from reality is neither as systematically constructed nor as narratively convincing. In movies it's almost taken for granted that a child trying to negotiate the world of adults on its own terms is a struggle against totalitarianism incarnate. It's routine for children to cope with this struggle on their own, in their own lives. Loosening the parental reigns and asserting yourself in adolescence is an important step that's good to get over with. Movies, on the other hand, are able to develop this narrative in metaphor and extend that metaphor to issues of broader import. The virtue of Pan's Labyrinth was that it excoriated the Franco regime of the Spanish Civil War without omitting any of the elements of good storytelling and exhilarating filmmaking. Hansel and Gretel, though, feels like being stuck at a bar with a couple of washed-out child prodigies. They're telling you about the time they committed murder and got away with it. But you're all drunk. Your interest in their story is of the same passing quality your friends' will have when you tell them you got drunk with the adult Hansel and Gretel. Pretty cool, but come on--

Dreams like these depend on the interpretation. The interpreters asleep in the House of Happy Children never made it through adolescence.

READ FULL POST . . .




Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Lotus Lantern Festival in Seoul

video
For those of you with access to my Facebook account, this will be a rerun. So, this isn't for you. It's for my grandpa. He's not on Facebook. The parade was held on April 26th.

READ FULL POST . . .




Monday, May 11, 2009

J.D. Salinger expected to back out of Gossip Girl cameo

I can say when the rain started last night. Not an exact time, mind you, but a dependable estimate. To be safe I'm going to install a 5 minute window looking out onto either exposure. Even with things as inconsequential as the recording of a routine spring rain, it's good form to be modest. In fact, especially with inconsequential things, modesty is the preferred approach (Malcolm Gladwell, amusing as always, makes this very point over at the New Yorker). I can't imagine too many day-to-day encounters more disagreeable than when two hammers confront one another and have their go at splitting hairs atop the head of anvil. So, give or take 5 minutes, it started to rain at 2:12 a.m on what was very early into my Monday, the middle region of your (U.S.A.) Sunday afternoon. That's some 14 hours behind schedule.

It's raining now and has been since it began. A fall as steady as the foundation of ancient Acropolis. I'd been waiting for it all day. Like, I said, it fell 14 hours late. A few weeks ago, I debuted on Twitter, refuse left behind by a friend who moved back to New York. She generously opened an account for me after several weeks of haggling. At 2:34 p.m. Sunday afternoon, I wrote: "waiting for the forecasted rain to start so i can head out. partly cloudy. mostly cloudy. mounting winds. low pressure. a little haste..." In full disclosure, I'd already been out to buy breakfast and breathe in that morning time, it's-going-to-rain-air, before meeting my parents via Skype to wish my mother Happy Mother's day and conduct one of our regularly scheduled 40-minute conversations, of which the predominant trope to emerge has been my blanket diffidence. It's a healthy mode so long as no one takes it too seriously. And it plays out something like the following:

The webcam doesn't work immediately, so my mother says 'I hate this thing'. After a minute or so, it starts working. She wonders aloud, 'why doesn't it ever work right', and then asks me how I'm doing. My parents proceed to shower me with positive suggestions about 'making the most' of my time, try to pique my interest with well-intended questions, occasionally inquire about or inform me of pertinent matters (their planned visit being the latest example) and find other, more nuanced ways to demonstrate their affection, ways particular to whatever dynamic we've generated since 1986 (not the year of my birth, but the year of my adoption), nuanced in the way typical of any relationship, idiosyncratic and derived from a close reading of our past. My usual response is deadpanned repartee and whatever it is a face looks like when a wry smile is suppressed. Seeing as a wry smile is something of a suppressed smile to begin with, I'm looking either especially wry, or especially suppressed. Eventually their questions and my jokes begin repeating themselves. Sometimes we identify them as such, as reprisals from earlier in the conversation or questions obviously paid scant attention and we make mention of it; sometimes we, or at least I am left feeling an impression of having already read through the script in hand, an experience not unlike deja vu, but located exclusively in an emotional register as opposed to the plane of visual hallucinations. Here, the script calls for us to say we love each other and 'goodbye,' which we do. COMMAND + Q and the exchange vanishes from sight.

I spent the rest of the morning reading various articles from various newspapers and magazines online, started and finished "The Stranger" by Albert Camus, out of habit I thought about it deeply for several minutes, and then started my foray through my first ever Balzac novel, "Cousin Bette."

I made instant coffee. Drank it. Made instant tea. Drank it. Poured myself some orange juice. Drank it. That was Sunday morning, waiting for the rain.

But sometime in the afternoon, the rain seemed as if it would never come, so I broke my promise to myself and ventured to the nearby markets to gather ingredients for dinner.

This small illustration appropriately characterizes my week writ large.

I did very little by conventional standards. Conventional standards being, say, making and keeping appointments with others, visiting places in the surrounding area, accomplishing tasks, getting things done. Somewhat misleading, but my general sense is that I did very little. But for one, I did sit the final exam for my first semester of Korean at the nearby Seoul National University. The course ran from the first week of March through last Thursday.

The class is intended for foreign faculty and foreign students, but receives its fair share of professionals not associated with the university, and a bumper crop of English teachers from all over. My class totaled 15, the worst of whom was, remarkably, Mark, a 55-year-old philosophy professor from America whose wife stopped attending with 4 weeks left, and who, if I heard him correctly, had a fair grasp of Japanese. The course load included weekly role plays of short dialogues modeled after the previous week's lesson. He approached these with all the circumspection of a philosophy professor, hands alternately clasped before him or behind, or poised warily at the waist, his tone determinedly set to "skeptic". His eyebrows did toe touches, so certain were they that their capture would be imminent should they allow themselves to rest. When asking his partner if there was a pen and how much one pen costs, he studied the ceiling. When receiving the answer he didn't stop saying 'mmmhmm, mhmmm...ahhh?" When we all took turns asking if a certain object is in the room -- Is there a clock in the room? Is there a computer in the room? -- he, this professor of philosophy, asked, "Is there a Mark in the room?"

He was the third tallest student behind the young Swedish man Joachim (whose parents chose that spelling over the more appropriately Swedish Joakim, because they wanted him to be "international", a strategy which we all concluded worked), and Olivia, a Brit and a lecturer of Chinese whose parents were diplomats and whose sister is a professor of another liberal art that eludes me now. One of us was pregnant, Sophia. She was also our lone Russian and the palest among us. One of us was a surgeon from Bangladesh who did not sleep. He had a hot temper and loved McDonald's. His nickname was McDonald's and eating McDonald's was one of two occasions that drew a smile out of him. The other was when he became so overwhelmed with studying "this damned language" (Korean) that he smiled the smile of absurdity and shook his head (rather rationally). He didn't show up for the final, which is perfectly acceptable considering the size of the brain tumor he and his colleagues removed the week before, assuming the picture on his phone was not photoshopped. No one asked why he had a cell phone picture of his patient's brain tumor on his phone. But it seems most likely that the tumor was so impressive it needed to be preserved on camera phone and shared with others. His girlfriend lives in Canada, and "yes, I would go to a Korean strip club."

The most affable was Mouidul, a 29-year-old Indian who favored the sport coat and taught conversational English at a university some ways south of Seoul. His closest companion was Charles, a former military man-cum-English teacher from Texas. He practices hapkido, having been taught by his father who "routinely kicked my ass" but who "I could now take because he's pushing 70". He's intense. So are his biceps and forearms, although, at 28, his crown is starting to show through what must have been until recently a respectable if ordinary head of hair. He deeply resents Korea. After visiting China he said "You know how people always look angry here, like people on the street, well in China people actually smile, and they'll even speak English to you." But don't take his perspective for scripture. He once relayed a telling story: A Korean taught another after hours class at his school. She only came for the one hour each day and so wasn't censored by the need to watch her words and maintain office relationships. One day she told him he'd better think of what he's going to do after this year, "I don't think they like you." He replied, "I know." And as he told me this story, it was obvious he did in fact know. He did the daily crossword puzzle in the English paper during his subway commute. He usually showed me them, asking for my help. He didn't do them very well, and I was no help.

The rest of us were unspectacular. Chairs making noise and handing in papers. The test was simple and brief. The next semester begins June 1.

That should be enough for this week. Already the present week is looking less eventful than the one just recounted, so the next update may very well be brief. I'm sure you won't mind. Next week, however, is our school's speech contest, for which my coworker has sworn me in (half in jest, I assume) as the "master of ceremony". I've been editing speeches about humankind's futile, outmoded campaign to rule over the animal kingdom, in which homo sapiens sapiens are compared to hyenas, rats and dogs, as well as lighter fare, a conventional recital of Robert Frost's The road less traveled, and the unsung glory of the three-leafed clover, which represents happiness but which is too often overlooked in preference for the coveted four-leafed clover, a symbol of that nefarious three-headed spirit -- luck, chance, and fortune -- and a stepping stone to a life consumed by avarice and the empty pursuit of fortune for fortune's sake.

For now, adieu. Sincerely yours.

XOXO,

Gossip Girl*

*And about the Gossip Girl sub-theme: I recently watched episode 21 of season 2, "Southern Gentlemen Prefer Blonds." I took note of every "dramatic moment" in the episode. The total, in 41 minutes of commercial free drama, was 34. Later, I'll get to this in more detail and also try to explain why I spent 41 minutes + typing time on such an exercise.

READ FULL POST . . .




Sunday, May 3, 2009

An update, an announcement, and an apology walk into a bar

Updates have gone missing. No real reason for them to have. The days have gently merged into each other as is their habit when habit asserts itself, and so too with them have any good intentions seized along the way -- the usual record of things done and seen, thoughts finely milled and reconstituted into still other thoughts, places travelled to and fro, people seen and spoken with, smells smelled, tastes tasted, memories made, remembered and forgotten. Another year's spring slough. More to add to the great forgotten menagerie of myself.

A FORMAL ANNOUNCEMENT!

I've made bad on a number of promises. Haven't said what I swore I'd say. Haven't done what I promised I'd do. So too has much of what I've privately held myself responsible for been permitted to run terribly afoul of my own empty agenda. In philosophy, I believe this is what happens when an irresistible force gets together with an immovable object for drinks and casual conversation. Or, politically speaking, the image we would have been left with were Tank Man (the Tienanmen Square protestor) and the tank engaged in not a standoff of democratic reform and individual freedom, but a regional speed walking competition.

SO--

I've decided to impose a new rule at Denny's Diner. Whereas before entries were continuously sought after and every waking thought and passing image potential material for the page, I will heretofore divert all happenings toward an unmarked reservoir somewhere toward the rear of my mind. Come Sunday or Monday evening, I'll check in on whatever has been collected and choose from it those things most compelling, or, if none possess the power to compel, I will find a way to render them significant. Regardless, I'll report something, always on Sunday or Monday, and only on Sunday or Monday. Adjust your schedules accordingly. Reconfigure your bookmarks and reassign your own online habits new orders.

Of course my most recent weeks have not been without event. I'll present them here in my favorite, obsolete form: the aphorism.

6 aphorisms on the occasion of my trip to Muui Island (Muuido), located a few kilometers from Incheon, off the country's northwest coast.

He who visits an island visits himself.
To seek respite on an island is to seek respite from oneself within oneself.
No one is so powerful as to refuse clouds their cover or rain their fall; but weak is the one too timid to wish for what is most wanted.
If you hurt in the morning you didn't during the night.
Too much fun is not fun; it's obnoxious.
Clams are good, but only good.

5 aphorisms and 1 modern parable on the occasion of my friend's departure to her home in New York where, this fall, she'll begin her trek toward a career in corporate law at her alma mater, Columbia University.

When one leaves another, neither will ever be whom he or she ever was.
If one leaves another and never again shall the two meet, both will forever be who they were.
You should have told me you were getting rid of Gravity's Rainbow.
Things begin. Things end.
If someone promises to never forget you, you'd best do the same. Same goes should that person break that promise.

In a grand building overlooking a reputable city there was, someways up, an especially well-regarded floor further divided into twenty-four rooms of equal dimension. Each room was fitted with one soundproof double door and one soundproof panoramic window. The ceiling and walls, too, were soundproofed according to the latest technology by the world's preeminent soundproofing contractor, constructed from parts produced by the world's foremost manufacturer. The rooms were regularly checked to ensure they complied with standard, a standard the building itself determined. If technology developed such that the building's existing facilities were rendered obsolete, the entire building would be shutdown, stripped, and refitted with the elements of the new vanguard -- one seemingly superfluous extravagance among many -- another being the price of real estate demanded to lease space for a boutique on its ground floor -- each of which nonetheless ensured its sterling reputation as a singular, unsurpassable construct. Of the twenty-four rooms, twenty-three were left vacant at all times. Occasionally, into the twenty-fourth, a crowd was gathered for a magnificent feast and for each member to confer with one another on a specific topic the precise nature of which none had been intimated prior to arrival, but to which all were made to swear their exclusive attention before being admitted, after which they were scrupulously monitored (one fact of which they were intimated).

It so happened that well into the building's existence, on a night conducted like every other in the history of such nights in the building, two of the attendees struck up a conversation unlike any other before it. It was not, however, particular in its content, but rather it differed, in a manner of speaking, in its tenor. For the building and more specifically the room, and still even more specifically the topic on which all were meant to converse (and it was different on any given night), never failed to dictate the terms through which all those gathered would communicate. Research, tireless research, more or less demonstrated to the night's organizers that they could suitably direct the party's intercourse by carefully calibrating its setting, regardless of the apparent variety in its attendees. The soundproof door and window were only the most overt effects. But it would be unnecessarily exhausting to detail each piece of the set, for they merely followed the current fashion, met and were met with the prevailing sensibility of the time, differing in style but uniform in substance and function. It is therefore necessary only to comment upon the soundproof door and window. Their technological development never required any drastic alteration to their cosmetic design. Thus, they are the building's exemplary feature. Sound neither penetrated nor escaped from it, yet they themselves did nothing to intrude upon the senses. 'Then' thus chased after 'If' like a doting child following its older sibling down the stairs. It was for this, this intrusion upon the senses, that the tireless research (mentioned above) was conducted. For whatever reason, those responsible for the building were concerned with anything that might provoke spontaneity. Any appeal to the senses was intentional, modeled after the research, and meant to provoke a predetermined reaction, or one of a set of predetermined reactions, which was itself monitored as yet more research, the results of which were weighed in determining the organization of future events.

And so it is not surprising that the two attendees upon whom our short tableau is focused were energetically talking back and forth on the assigned topic. But how exactly it is that they managed to slide into an unforeseen vocal register, so to speak, is a two-fold mystery. First, as with all sensual variables, the organizers had indeed discovered the key to all manners of communication -- to name a few among the many: connotation, allusion, intonation, the silent, kinetic language of the body, even the invisible lines transmitted in furtive and overt glances. Therefore neither lapse in control nor in observation could support the anomaly. Second, the results were not even observed, properly speaking. Thus, in truth, no one has authority to confirm what follows. The conclusion drawn must be regarded as conjecture. And as such, and seeing as it is, as has just been stated, an anomaly, the organization itself paid and continues to pay the conclusion scant attention. It was made a note of in passing and filed away with the whole report whose general attitude reaffirmed the research, perhaps to be picked up by a future researcher interested in esoterica, but, more likely, to be forgotten.

Here is what happened, without being observed, our conjecture: At some point in the night the woman -- the two before us were man and woman -- excused herself from their conversation. As is polite, the man granted her leave. He met no difficulty in joining another discussion, made all the easier given the condition that everyone in attendance contemplated the same thing. At some point the night emptied itself of its duties. One by one the attendees left the room, left the building, left one another, once again meeting at street level the world in a state more or less unfiltered. Long before the night was over and each of the twenty-four rooms once again vacant, the man finished his last drink, made his final round, and left. All were free to leave on their own, when they saw fit. He was among the later in leaving, but even then their remained a significant crowd. He was somewhere in the middle.

It was only on his way back home, by taxi, that he felt what we have come to call our 'conjecture'. Although he swore he made his last round throughout the room as something of an unconscious act of distraction, merely sweeping the grounds as one does before locking up, as if he were responsible for the calm order of his own evening, he now came to realize that he never again met the woman, and wondered if, beneath the one level of unconsciousness there was not a second level supporting it, as the foundation surely supported the boutiques on the building's first floor. And it was sometime during the brief ride to his home that he decided, based on nothing but his own instinct, an instinct of which he remained extremely suspicious, that the woman had left before he, that among the busy room he had sensed the exact moment she shut the door behind her with him still inside, but that his attention was diverted elsewhere and so he could not seize hold of this event within the event. Furthermore, he felt his final sweep was not out of habit, but led by the force of a distinct purpose, namely, that he must, for some reason indiscernible to him, find her. Why? That he did not know. To say one more thing. To not say one more thing. To ask how her night went. To comment upon his own. To ask her opinion of the current politics, her opinion of tourist spots in Southeast Asia; whether she prefers coffee or tea; whether she thought her time in university was the most cherished of her life thus far, or if she longed for still earlier times, when perhaps pain had not yet borne itself upon her conscience and still remained only on the surface of her body as he was sure it did for everyone up to a certain age; or was it that no time for her had yet brought her the delight she felt all people deserve and her patience for the future was thinning; maybe he would have probed through her thoughts of her own friends, her lovers, her family; to ask, calling her by name (if he knew it and remembered it) and laying a hand on her arm, if she'd ever lost someone, or whom she missed most in her life; to gain her full attention, employing every social tactic to which he had access, a rueful smile, a tacit gesture, a calculated tone, and then proceed with something like: "I'm sorry, miss, I hope you don't find this too untoward, but I've been meaning to ask since we first met, do you remember it? it was earlier this evening. Anyway, I've been meaning to ask: 'what do you think of your own teeth?' "

Then, suddenly, a second thought struck him, cutting across this first, like a sobering draught (or was it only an open window?). He was home. The driver awaited his fare. The man paid enough for a generous tip. When the driver went to return his change, he refused it and exited the car. He said goodbye to the driver, who thanked him and wished him a goodnight before leaving. Now he was alone, virtually at his own doorstep, the shortest of walks away from the comforts of his home. It wasn't late, but it was dark. Cold? Not really. A warm night. A little humid. Must be summer. A sky scattered with details he didn't notice. Things were going on in the background. What was it, though? This he thought on his way to his front door. What was I just thinking about?

---

There's an alley outside my placed lined with stacks of discarded cardboard. It's less feral than the above post. The result of having not put a word down for over two weeks, having a Subway sandwich and Coke to maintain my energy, and finishing an auspicious last night of Korean (with the final test this Thursday). Sorry if it reads like an unorganized cryptogram. See you next week. 

READ FULL POST . . .